Graduate studies at Western
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):235-246 (2003)
|Abstract||The objective of this article is to analyse and compare four methods of ethical case deliberation. These include Clinical Pragmatism, The Nijmegen Method of ethical case deliberation, Hermeneutic dialogue, and Socratic dialogue. The origin of each method will be briefly sketched. Furthermore, the methods as well as the related protocols will be presented. Each method will then be evaluated against the background of those situations in which it is being used. The article aims to show that there is not one ideal method of ethical case deliberation, which fits to all possible kinds of moral problems. Rather, as each of the methods highlights a limited number of morally relevant aspects, each method has its strengths and weaknesses as well. These strengths and weaknesses should be evaluated in relation to different types of situations, for instance moral problems in treatment decisions, moral uneasiness and residue, and the like. The suggestion arrived at on the basis of the findings of this paper is a reasonable methodological plurality. This means that a method can be chosen depending on the type of moral problem to be deliberated upon. At the same time it means, that by means of a method, deliberation should be facilitated|
|Keywords||clinical ethics clinical pragmatism ethical case deliberation hermeneutics method participation protocol Socratic dialogue|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bert Molewijk, Dick Kleinlugtenbelt & Guy Widdershoven (2011). The Role of Emotions in Moral Case Deliberation: Theory, Practice, and Methodology. Bioethics 25 (7):383-393.
Martin Calkins (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.
Diego Gracia (2003). Ethical Case Deliberation and Decision Making. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):227-233.
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Loretta M. Kopelman (1994). Case Method and Casuistry: The Problem of Bias. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).
Y. Michael Barilan & Margherita Brusa (2011). Triangular Reflective Equilibrium: A Conscience-Based Method for Bioethical Deliberation. Bioethics 25 (6):304-319.
F. C. Weidema, A. C. Molewijk, G. A. M. Widdershoven & T. A. Abma (2012). Enacting Ethics: Bottom-Up Involvement in Implementing Moral Case Deliberation. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (1):1-19.
I. van de Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1).
I. Van De Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1 - 13.
Cynthia B. Cohen (2005). Promises and Perils of Public Deliberation: Contrasting Two National Bioethics Commissions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):269-288.
Norbert L. Steinkamp (2003). Editorial: European Debates on Ethical Case Deliberation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):225-226.
Lester F. Goodchild (1986). Toward a Foundational Normative Method in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):485 - 499.
Francesca Poggiolesi (2010). Display Calculi and Other Modal Calculi: A Comparison. Synthese 173 (3):259 - 279.
Roopen N. Majithia (2006). Function, Intuition and Ends in Aristotle's Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):187 - 200.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads10 ( #114,476 of 740,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 740,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?