David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):111-134 (2006)
Ernesto Laclau's theory of antagonism and political identity has been widely celebrated as one of the most promising attempts to apply the lessons of poststructuralism to political theory. This essay argues, however, that this initial promise is not fulfilled. Laclau's attempt to define and analyse the political as such operates at such an abstract level that Laclau is forced to make sweeping claims about the nature of politics and identity that he simply cannot support; and his analysis of the decision that he claims defines politics is an unrealistic one that celebrates violence, and could have the wide appeal it has had only in a political culture that understood freedom as the absence of all constraint, rather than the achievement of autonomy. Key Words: antagonism autonomy decision freedom hegemony identity Laclau the political rule-following Wittgenstein.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martin McQuillan (ed.) (2007). The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy. Pluto Press.
Simon Critchley (1998). Metaphysics in the Dark: A Response to Richard Rorty and Ernesto Laclau. Political Theory 26 (6):803-817.
Kevin Inston (2009). Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Ernesto Laclau and the Somewhat Particular Universal. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):555-587.
Michael Kaplan (2010). The Rhetoric of Hegemony: Laclau, Radical Democracy, and the Rule of Tropes. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (3):253-283.
Eduard Grebe (2009). Contingency, Contestation and Hegemony: The Possibility of a Non-Essentialist Politics for the Left. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):589-611.
Mark Anthony Wenman (2003). Laclau or Mouffe? Splitting the Difference. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (5):581-606.
Thomas Brockleman (2003). The Failure of the Radical Democratic Imaginary: I Ek Versus Laclau and Mouffe on Vestigial Utopia. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2).
Andrew Norris (2002). Against Antagonism:On Ernesto Laclau's Political Thought. Constellations 9 (4):554-573.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #54,003 of 1,100,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,337 of 1,100,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?