David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 250 (3) (2007)
The advent of the special theory of relativity in 1905 brought many problems for the physics community. One, it seemed, would not be a great source of trouble. It was the problem of reconciling Newtonian gravitation theory with the new theory of space and time. Indeed it seemed that Newtonian theory could be rendered compatible with special relativity by any number of small modiﬁcations, each of which would be unlikely to lead to any signiﬁcant deviations from the empirically testable conse- 1 quences of Newtonian theory. Einstein’s response to this problem is now legend. He decided almost immediately to abandon the search for a Lorentz covariant gravitation theory, for he had failed to construct such a theory that was compatible with the equality of inertial and gravitational mass. Positing what he later called the principle of equivalence, he decided that gravitation theory held the key to repairing what he perceived as the defect of the special theory of relativity—its relativity principle.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michel Janssen (2009). Drawing the Line Between Kinematics and Dynamics in Special Relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (1):26-52.
John D. Norton (1995). Did Einstein Stumble? The Debate Over General Covariance. Erkenntnis 42 (2):223 - 245.
John D. Norton (2000). `Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas': Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):135-170.
Hans C. Ohanian (2009). Did Einstein Prove E=Mc2? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2):167-173.
Domenico Giulini & Norbert Straumann (2006). Einstein's Impact on the Physics of the Twentieth Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):115-173.
Similar books and articles
Bertrand Russell (1925). Abc of Relativity. Routledge.
Arthur Stanley Eddington (1920). Space, Time, and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
R. M. Nugayev (1987). The Genesis and Structure of Models in the Modern Theory of Gravity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):84 – 104.
F. A. Muller & Jeremy Butterfield (1994). Is Algebraic Lorentz-Covariant Quantum Field Theory Stochastic Einstein Local? Philosophy of Science 61 (3):457-474.
John Byron Manchak (2012). Essay Review:Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation TheoryDavid Malament , Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory . Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2012), Xii+349 Pp., $55.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 79 (4):575-583.
V. A. Fok (1964). The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation. New York, Macmillan.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2001). Indeterminism, Classical Gravitation and Non-Collision Singularities. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):269 – 274.
John Norton, Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and the Problems in the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies That Led Him to It.
Laszlo E. Szabo (forthcoming). Lorentzian Theories Vs. Einsteinian Special Relativity - a Logico-Empiricist Reconstruction. In A. Maté, M. Rédei & F. Stadler (eds.), Vienna Circle and Hungary -- Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis. Springer
Jonathan Bain (1998). Whitehead's Theory of Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (4):547-574.
Abraham Ungar (1986). The Lorentz Transformation Group of the Special Theory of Relativity Without Einstein's Isotropy Convention. Philosophy of Science 53 (3):395-402.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads40 ( #103,263 of 1,907,353 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #53,754 of 1,907,353 )
How can I increase my downloads?