Eaters of the lotus: Landauer's principle and the return of Maxwell's demon

Landauer’s principle is the loosely formulated notion that the erasure of n bits of information must always incur a cost of k ln n in thermodynamic entropy. It can be formulated as a precise result in statistical mechanics, but by erasure processes that use a thermodynamically irreversible phase space expansion, which is the real origin of the law’s entropy cost. General arguments that purport to establish the unconditional validity of the law (erasure maps many physical states to one; erasure compresses the phase space) fail. They turn out to depend on the illicit formation of a canonical ensemble from memory devices holding random data. To exorcise Maxwell’s demon one must show that all candidate devices—the ordinary and the extraordinary—must fail to reverse the second law of thermodynamics. The theorizing surrounding Landauer’s principle is too fragile and too tied to a few specific examples to support such general exorcism. Charles Bennett has recently extended Landauer’s principle in order to exorcise a no erasure demon proposed by John Earman and me. The extension fails for the same reasons as trouble the original principle.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.12.002
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jos Uffink (2001). Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (3):305-394.
Charles H. Bennett (2003). Notes on Landauer's Principle, Reversible Computation, and Maxwell's Demon. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (3):501-510.
Jeffrey Bub (2001). Maxwell's Demon and the Thermodynamics of Computation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (4):569-579.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John D. Norton (2011). Waiting for Landauer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (3):184-198.
John D. Norton (2006). Atoms, Entropy, Quanta: Einstein's Miraculous Argument of 1905. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):71-100.
James Ladyman & Katie Robertson (2013). Landauer Defended: Reply to Norton. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):263-271.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

56 ( #61,073 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

28 ( #34,733 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.