David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):475-486 (2009)
Mathias Frisch has argued that the requirement that electromagnetic dispersion processes are causal adds empirical content not found in electrodynamic theory. I urge that this attempt to reconstitute a local principle of causality in physics fails. An independent principle is not needed to recover the results of dispersion theory. The use of ‘causality conditions’ proves to be the mere adding of causal labels to an already presumed fact. If instead one seeks a broader, independently formulated grounding for the conditions, that grounding either fails or dissolves into vagueness and ambiguity, as has traditionally been the fate of candidate principles of causality. Introduction Scattering in Classical Electrodynamics Sufficiency of the Physics Failure of the Principle of Causality Proposed 4.1 A sometimes principle 4.2 The conditions of applicability are obscure 4.3 Effects can come before their causes 4.4 Vagueness of the relata and of the notion of causal process Conclusion CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Frank Arntzenius (1990). Causal Paradoxes in Special Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (2):223-243.
Mathias Frisch (2009). 'The Most Sacred Tenet'? Causal Reasoning in Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):459-474.
Citations of this work BETA
Matt Farr & Alexander Reutlinger (2013). A Relic of a Bygone Age? Causation, Time Symmetry and the Directionality Argument. Erkenntnis 78 (2):215-235.
Steven French (2012). Unitary Inequivalence as a Problem for Structural Realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (2):121-136.
Mehmet Elgin (2010). How Could There Be True Causal Claims Without There Being Special Causal Facts in the World? Philosophia 38 (4):755-771.
Mathias Frisch (2012). No Place for Causes? Causal Skepticism in Physics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):313-336.
Haines Brown (2014). A Process Ontology. Axiomathes 24 (3):291-312.
Similar books and articles
Erik Curiel (2000). The Constraints General Relativity Places on Physicalist Accounts of Causality. Theoria 15 (1):33-58.
James T. Cushing (1986). Causality as an Overarching Principle in Physics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:3 - 11.
Craig Dilworth (1994). Principles, Laws, Theories and the Metaphysics of Science. Synthese 101 (2):223 - 247.
Sieghard Beller & Gregory Kuhnm (2007). What Causal Conditional Reasoning Tells Us About People's Understanding of Causality. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):426 – 460.
David Bohm (1957/1999). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Alexander Rosenberg (1989). Russell Versus Steiner on Physics and Causality. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):341-347.
Claude Hillinger (1968). A Generalization of the Principle of Causality, Which Makes It Applicable to Evolutionary Systems. Synthese 18 (1):68 - 74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #76,840 of 1,692,510 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,508 of 1,692,510 )
How can I increase my downloads?