Moral Reasoning and Religious Belief: does content influence structure?
Journal of Moral Education 27 (1):89-98 (1998)
| Abstract | Abstract Kohlberg's theory of moral development draws a distinction between content and structure of moral thought. An inference based on this distinction is that content and structure are independent. To investigate this inference, we studied fourth?and eighth?grade students in two distinct educational settings in the United States. Sample 1 contained 83 students attending a church?sponsored, evangelical Christian school. Sample 2 contained 60 students attending government?supported public schools. Students were administered Kohlberg's moral dilemmas of life versus law, punishment versus conscience, and authority versus contract. Christian school students made more religious references in resolving dilemmas. More Christian than public school students favoured law, punishment and authority. More importantly, regardless of the school attended, students who used religious terminology to resolve dilemmas were less likely to reason in Kohlberg's Stage 2 than those who did not. Grade differences emerged. Regardless of terminology, most fourth?grade students used some Stage 2 reasoning. However, among eighth?grade students, using religious terminology correlated with less Stage 2 reasoning. The results of our study raise doubts as to the independence of structure and content | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn A. Wood, Justin G. Longenecker, Joseph A. McKinney & Carlos W. Moore (1988). Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4):249 - 257.
Alan L. Lockwood (1975). Stage of Moral Development and Students' Reasoning on Public Policy Issues. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):51-61.
Ian Wright (1978). Moral Reasoning and Conduct of Selected Elementary School Students. Journal of Moral Education 7 (3):199-205.
June Paradise Maul (1980). A High School with Intensive Education: Moral Atmosphere and Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education 10 (1):9-17.
Djilali Bouhmama (1984). Assessment of Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development in Two Cultures. Journal of Moral Education 13 (2):124-132.
Freddy Mortier (1995). Separate Values Education and Moral Development in Flemish Secondary Schools. Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):409-426.
Rachael M. Henry (1987). Moral Belief Structure and Content, Self‐Identity and Parental Favouritism as Determinants of Moral Judgement Stage. Journal of Moral Education 16 (1):3-17.
James A. Knight (1995). Moral Growth in Medical Students. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (3).
Lawrence J. Walker & Thomas J. Moran (1991). Moral Reasoning in a Communist Chinese Society. Journal of Moral Education 20 (2):139-155.
Richard Bernardi, Caryn Lecca, Jennifer Murphy & Elizabeth Sturgis (2011). Does Education Influence Ethical Decisions? An International Study. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):235-256.
Ann Breslin (1982). Tolerance and Moral Reasoning Among Adolescents in Ireland. Journal of Moral Education 11 (2):112-127.
Lynn Hickey Schultz, Dennis J. Barr & Robert L. Selman (2001). The Value of a Developmental Approach to Evaluating Character Development Programmes: An Outcome Study of Facing History and Ourselves. Journal of Moral Education 30 (1):3-27.
Anne Colby, Lawrence Kohlberg, Edwin Fenton, Betsy Speicher‐Dubin & Marcus Lieberman (1977). Secondary School Moral Discussion Programmes Led by Social Studies Teachers. Journal of Moral Education 6 (2):90-111.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads5 ( #162,017 of 556,904 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,904 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
