Speed limits, human lives, and convenience: A reply to Ridge
Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):59–64 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarc F. Krellenstein (1987). A Reply to Parallel Computation and the Mind-Body Problem. Cognitive Science 11:155-7.
Hugh LaFollette (1989). Animal Rights and Human Wrongs. In Nigel Dower (ed.), Ethics and the Environment.
Martin K. Solomon (1978). Some Results on Measure Independent Gödel Speed-Ups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (4):667-672.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (2):135–167.
Nelson Cowan (1998). What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
R. P. Peerenboom (2005). Cross-Cultural Dialogue on Human Rights and the Limits of Conversation: A Reply to Stephen Angle. Philosophy East and West 55 (2):324-327.
Randall P. Peerenboom (2005). Cross-Cultural Dialogue on Human Rights and the Limits of Conversation: A Reply to Stephen Angle. Philosophy East and West 55 (2):324-327.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,239 of 548,951 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,951 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
