David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 3 (2):299 - 320 (1984)
In this article I argue for a full appraisal of Hobbes's theory of punishment which takes account of its divergent and contradictory aspects. Examining his theory within the general context of his position in Leviathan, it is possible to see its centrality for the subsequent development of the modern philosophy of punishment. From this point of view, it is also possible to pinpoint the source of a central weakness in the retributive theory of punishment.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alan Norrie (1989). Punishment and Justice in Adam Smith. Ratio Juris 2 (3):227-239.
Similar books and articles
Thom Brooks (2003). Kant's Theory of Punishment. Utilitas 15 (02):206-.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
David Wood (2010). Punishment: Consequentialism. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Ido Weijers (2000). Punishment and Upbringing: Considerations for an Educative Justification of Punishment. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):61-73.
Greg Roebuck & David Wood (2011). A Retributive Argument Against Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Thom Brooks (2005). Kantian Punishment and Retributivism: A Reply to Clark. Ratio 18 (2):237–245.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #27,830 of 1,679,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #112,088 of 1,679,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?