Why strong sociologists abhor a vacuum: Shapin and Schaffer on the boyle/hobbes controversy
Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (4):9-40 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Petri Ylikoski (2004). Interests, Folk Psychology and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):265 – 279.
Mario Bacelar Valente (2011). A Case for an Empirically Demonstrable Notion of the Vacuum in Quantum Electrodynamics Independent of Dynamical Fluctuations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):241-261.
K. Brad Wray (2010). Kuhn's Constructionism. Perspectives on Science 18 (3):311-327.
Charles T. Wolfe (2011). Why Was There No Controversy Over Life in the Scientific Revolution? In Victor Boantza Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Controversies in the Scientific Revolution. John Benjamins.
Tzachi Zamir (2004). The Sense of Smell: Morality and Rhetoric in the Bramhall-Hobbes Controversy. Sophia 43 (2):49-61.
A. Malet (2001). The Power of Images: Mathematics and Metaphysics in Hobbes's Optics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):303-333.
Steven Shapin & Simon Schaffer (1989). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.
Richard S. Westfall (1987). Book Review:Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (1):128-.
Sungho Choi (2007). Causes and Probability-Raisers of Processes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):81 – 91.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,300 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,811 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |

