Medieval Obligationes as a Theory of Discursive Commitment Management

Vivarium 49 (1-3):240-257 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In earlier work, I have presented an interpretation of Obligationes as logical games of consistency maintenance; this interpretation has some advantages, in particular that of capturing the multi-agent, goal-oriented, rule-governed nature of the enterprise by means of the game analogy. But it has as its main limitation the fact that it does not provide a satisfactory account of the deontic aspect of the framework—i.e. of what being obliged to a certain statement consists in. In order to remedy this shortcoming, this paper argues for the more encompassing thesis that Obligationes can be viewed as a theory of rational dialogical practices, in particular concerning the management of one's discursive commitments. The main inspiration for this interpretation comes from R. Brandom's inferentialist, normative pragmatism, but more generally, it relies heavily on a dialogical conception of logic. I argue that it offers a more compelling account of several aspects of the obligational framework, in particular the role of doubting responses and the ubiquity of obligational vocabulary in the context of scientific discourse in the medieval tradition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An intensional interpretation of ockham's theory of supposition.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 365-393.
Formalizing medieval logic: Suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes (review).Mary Sirridge - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 469-470.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-29

Downloads
76 (#197,826)

6 months
14 (#114,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?