David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):117-141 (2006)
In 1597 Francisco Suárez published a comprehensive treatise on beings of reason (entia rationis) as part of his Disputationes metaphysicae. Subsequent scholastic philosophers vigorously debated various aspects of Suárez’s theory. The aim of this paper is to identify some of the most controversial points of these debates, as they developed in the first half of the seventeenth century. In particular, I focus on the intension and the extension of ‘ens rationis’, its division (into negations, privations and relations of reason) and its causes. Additionally, I will discuss how Suárez’s views sparked a number of debates within the classical view, debates which ultimately led to the emergence of various alternative theories, especially among the Jesuits. These non-classical views radically revise the previous classical conception of beings of reason
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bernardo J. Canteñs (2003). Suárez on Beings of Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):171-187.
Daniel Novotny (2013). Ens Rationis From Suárez to Caramuel: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era. Fordham University Press.
John P. Doyle (1987). Suarez on Beings of Reason and Truth (1). Vivarium 25 (1):47-75.
John P. Doyle (1988). Suarez on Beings of Reason and Truth (2). Vivarium 26 (1):51-72.
Edward Grant (2001). God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Shields (2012). Metaphysics. Shadows of Being: Francisco Suarez's 'Entia Rationis'. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oup Oxford.
Patricia Díaz-Herrera (2006). The Notion of Time in Francisco Suárez and its Contemporary Relevance. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):142-159.
Justin Skirry (2004). Descartes's Conceptual Distinction and its Ontological Import. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):121-144.
Jan Palkoska (2010). Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu. Studia Neoaristotelica 7 (1):28-48.
Victoria McGreer (2008). Varieties of Moral Agency: Lessons From Autism (and Psychopathy). In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3. MIT Press.
Thomas Pink (2012). Reason and Obligation in Suárez. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oup Oxford.
Daniel Schwartz (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Stefano Bacin (2010). The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads8 ( #172,583 of 1,102,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?