Review of Albert of Saxony, Quaestiones circa logicam (twenty-five disputed questions on logic) [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):249-250 (2011)
Albert of Saxony is now recognized as one of the most significant fourteenth-century philosophers—as evidenced, for example, by the entry dedicated to him in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that his reputation is still somewhat overshadowed by the two giants of fourteenth-century nominalism, William of Ockham and John Buridan. Albert's work is often discussed in the context of more extensive analyses of these two authors, which might be seen as suggesting that the significance of his views is secondary. More importantly, the idea that he was not an original thinker but merely a "follower" of Ockham or Buridan is still widespread.The translation into English of Albert's ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Henrik Lagerlund (2004). Albert of Saxony's Twenty-Five Disputed Questions on Logic. Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):837-839.
Michael J. Fitzgerald (2006). Problems with Temporality and Scientific Propositions in John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):305-337.
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (1986). Buridan, Albert of Saxony and Oresme, and a Fourteenth-Century Collection of Quaestiones on the Physics and on De Generatione Et Corruptione. Vivarium 24 (1):70-82.
Mark G. Henninger (ed.) (2008). Henry of Harclay: Ordinary Questions, I-XIV. OUP/British Academy.
Alexander Broadie (1993). Introduction to Medieval Logic. Oxford University Press.
Mark G. Henninger (ed.) (2008). Henry of Harclay: Ordinary Questions, XV-XXIX. OUP/British Academy.
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (2009). The Debate Over the Nature of Motion: John Buridan, Nicole Oresme and Albert of Saxony. With an Edition of John Buridan's Quaestiones Super Libros Physicorum, Secundum Ultima Lecturam, Book III, Q.17. Early Science and Medicine 14 (1):186-210.
Henrik Lagerlund (2004). John Buridan and the Problems of Dualism in the Early Fourteenth Century. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):369-387.
E. P. Bos, The Spot on the Moon (The Views of John Buridan, Nicholas of Oresme, Albert of Saxony and Marsilius of Inghen, with an Edition of Marsilius of Inghen's 'Quaestiones in Librum Aristotelis De Caelo Et Mundo II, 14).
Johannes M. M. H. Thijssen (2005). Prolegomena to a Study of John Buridan's Physics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):493-502.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2007). Theory of Supposition Vs. Theory of Fallacies in Ockham. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):343-359.
Michael J. Fitzgerald (2009). Time as a Part of Physical Objects: The Modern 'Descartes-Minus Argument' and an Analogous Argument From Fourteenth-Century Logic (William Heytesbury and Albert of Saxony). Vivarium 47 (1):54-73.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2005). Buridan's Consequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):277-297.
Added to index2011-04-17
Total downloads11 ( #139,354 of 1,102,628 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #121,188 of 1,102,628 )
How can I increase my downloads?