David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 151 (1):125 - 153 (2006)
In [Dutilh Novaes, Medieval-obligations as logical Games of Consistency maintenance, synthese, (2004)], I proposed a reconstruction of Walter Burley’s theory of obligationes, based on the idea that Burley’s theory of obligationes could be seen as a logical game of consistency maintenance. In the present paper, I intend to test the game hypothesis on another important theory of obligationes, namely Roger Swyneshed’s theory. In his treatise on obligationes [edited by P.V. Spade, cf. Spade History and philosophy of Logic 3(1982) 1-32], Swyneshed introduced significant modifications to the general framework of obligationes. To compare the two theories, I apply the same formal apparatus used in the previous paper. It will become patent that Swyneshed’s theory is considerably different from Burley’s, among other reasons because the dynamic aspects that play a major role in the latter are simply not present in the former. My conclusion is that Swyneshed’s version of obligationes is not directed towards consistency maintenance, but rather towards inference recognition, and that it is, from a game-theoretical perspective, less interesting a theory than Burley’s.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hajo Keffer (2001). De Obligationibus : Rekonstruktion Einer Spätmittelalterlichen Disputationstheorie. Brill.
Eleonore Stump (1981). Roger Swyneshed's Theory of Obligations'. Medioevo 7:135-174.
E. Jennifer Ashworth (1996). Autour des Obligationes de Roger Swyneshed: La Nova Responsio. Les Etudes Philosophiques:341-360.
E. Jennifer Ashworth (1981). The Problems of Relevance and Order in Obligational Disputations: Some Late Fourteenth Century Views. Medioevo 7:175-193.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Sirridge (2009). Formalizing Medieval Logic: Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 469-470.
Vincent Spade Paul (1982). Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):1-32.
C. Dutilh Novaes (2005). Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance. Synthese 145 (3):371 - 395.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2011). Medieval Obligationes as a Theory of Discursive Commitment Management. Vivarium 49 (1-3):240-257.
Paul Vincent Spade & Eleonore Stump (1983). Walter Burley and the Obligationes Attributed to William of Sherwood. History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2):9-26.
Paul Vincent Spade (1992). If Obligationes Were Counterfactuals. Philosophical Topics 20 (2):171-188.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2011). Disputation and Logic in the Medieval Treatises De Modo Opponendi Et Respondendi. Vivarium 49 (1-3):127-149.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2006). Ralph Strode's Obligationes: The Return of Consistency and the Epistemic Turn. Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):338-374.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #175,574 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?