David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):338-374 (2006)
In what follows, I analyze Ralph Strode's treatise on obligations. I have used a hitherto unpublished edition of the text (based on 14 manuscripts) made by Prof. E.J. Ashworth. I first give a brief description of Strode's text, which is all the more necessary given that it is not available to the average reader; I also offer a reconstruction of the rules proposed by Strode, following the style of reconstruction used in my analysis of Burley's and Swyneshed's rules elsewhere—that is, essentially based on the idea that obligationes can be viewed as logical games. In the second part, I address Strode's explicit arguments contra Swyneshed. In the third part, I discuss Strode's epistemic and pragmatic approach to obligationes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
C. Dutilh Novaes (2008). A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):227-261.
Similar books and articles
Paul Vincent Spade & Eleonore Stump (1983). Walter Burley and the Obligationes Attributed to William of Sherwood. History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2):9-26.
C. Dutilh Novaes (2005). Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance. Synthese 145 (3):371 - 395.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2011). Medieval Obligationes as a Theory of Discursive Commitment Management. Vivarium 49 (1-3):240-257.
Michael Winterbottom (1989). Guglielmo Cavallo (Ed.): Le Strode Del Testo. (Studi E Commenti, 5.) Pp. Ix + 159; 2 Illustrations of MS. Bari: Adriatica Editrice, 1987. L. 28,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (01):160-.
Vincent Spade Paul (1982). Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):1-32.
Ronald Syme (1939). Roman Frontiers and Roads Quaderni Delľ Impero: Il Limes Romano (I-IX) and Le Grandi Strode Del Mondo Romano (I-XIII). Rome: Istituto di Studi Romani, 1937 and 1938. Paper, 2 or 3 Lire Each (According to Size). [For Details See C.R. LII, 158 F.]. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (01):28-30.
Riccardo Strobino (2011). Contexts of Utterance and Evaluation in Peter of Mantua's Obligationes. Vivarium 49 (1-3):275-299.
Mikko Yrjönsuuri (2009). Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories: Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes. Vivarium 47 (4):480-482.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2006). Roger Swyneshed's Obligationes: A Logical Game of Inference Recognition? Synthese 151 (1):125 - 153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #107,389 of 1,679,348 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,761 of 1,679,348 )
How can I increase my downloads?