David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2):425-437 (2008)
Graphical displays of simple moving geometrical figures have been repeatedly used to study the attribution of animacy in human observers. Yet little is known about the relevant movement characteristics responsible for this experience. The present study introduces a novel parametric research paradigm, which allows for the experimental control of specific motion parameters and a predictable influence on the attribution of animacy. Two experiments were conducted using 3D computer animations of one or two objects systematically introducing variations in the following aspects of motion: directionality, discontinuity and responsiveness. Both experiments further varied temporal kinematics. Results showed that animacy experience increased with the time a moving object paused in the vicinity of a second object and with increasing complexity of interaction between the objects . The experience of animacy could be successfully modulated in a parametric fashion by the systematic variation of comparably simple differential movement characteristics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M. Leslie & Uta Frith (1985). Does the Autistic Child Have a “Theory of Mind”? Cognition 21 (1):37-46.
György Gergely, Zoltán Nádasdy, Gergely Csibra & Szilvia Bíró (1995). Taking the Intentional Stance at 12 Months of Age. Cognition 56 (2):165-193.
György Gergely & Gergely Csibra (2003). Teleological Reasoning in Infancy: The Naı̈ve Theory of Rational Action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (7):287-292.
Gergely Csibra, György Gergely, Szilvia Bı́ró, Orsolya Koós & Margaret Brockbank (1999). Goal Attribution Without Agency Cues: The Perception of ‘Pure Reason’ in Infancy. Cognition 72 (3):237-267.
Brian J. Scholl & Patrice D. Tremoulet (2000). Perceptual Causality and Animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (8):299-309.
Citations of this work BETA
Somogy Varga (forthcoming). The Case for Mind Perception. Synthese:1-21.
L. SchiLbach, S. Eickhoff, A. RotArskajagiela, G. Fink & K. Vogeley (2008). Minds at Rest? Social Cognition as the Default Mode of Cognizing and its Putative Relationship to the "Default System" of the Brain. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2):457--467.
Similar books and articles
Norbert Victor (1980). Medical Diagnostics with Nonparametric Allocation Rules. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (1):85-94.
Jan Sprenger (2011). Science Without (Parametric) Models: The Case of Bootstrap Resampling. Synthese 180 (1):65 - 76.
Tracy Long (2008). Diving for Pearls: The Importance of Board Induction and Re-Induction. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):40.
Richard W. Lind (1996). Micro-Phenomenology: Toward a Hypothetico-Inductive Science of Experience. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):429-42.
John D. Norton (2013). A Material Dissolution of the Problem of Induction. Synthese 191 (4):1-20.
Simon Blackburn (1973). Reason and Prediction. London,Cambridge University Press.
Kazuyoshi Kamiyama (2008). No Need to Justify Induction Generally. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:105-111.
James D. Madden (2004). Aristotle, Induction, and First Principles. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):35-52.
Moti Mizrahi (2013). The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far. Synthese 190 (15):3209-3226.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads6 ( #454,452 of 1,793,075 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,508 of 1,793,075 )
How can I increase my downloads?