From Representation to Thirdness and Representamen to Medium: Evolution of Peircean Key Terms and Topics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (4):445-481 (2011)
The nature of representation has been a central but controversial issue of cognitive philosophy. After 2,500 years of reflection (cf. Rolf 2006), opinions are still divided. On the one hand, there are those who are convinced that we have reached a crisis of representation in the arts, the media, and cultural theory; on the other hand, representation has remained right at the top of the agenda of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence research (cf. Nöth & Ljungberg, eds. 2003; Nöth 1997). The words in which Daniel Dennett, in 1978, postulates the necessity for a new theory of representation as a foundation of cognitive science are symptomatic of a certain unease about the state of the art: "What is needed is ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel C. Dennet (ed.) (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Bradford Books.
Winfried Nöth (2010). The Criterion of Habit in Peirce's Definitions of the Symbol. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):82-93.
Winfried Nöth (1997). Representation in Semiotics and in Computer Science. Semiotica 115 (3-4):203-214.
Lucia Santaella Braga (1999). A New Causality for the Understanding of the Living. Semiotica 127 (1-4):497-520.
Kenneth Laine Ketner (2007). A Brief Intellectual Autobiography by Charles Sanders Peirce. American Journal of Semiotics 2 (1/2):61-83.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dr Wayne Christensen (2010). The Decoupled Representation Theory of the Evolution of Cognition--A Critical Assessment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):361-405.
William S. Robinson (1999). Representation and Cognitive Explanation. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality, Riegler. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub
Jacqueline Anne Sullivan (2010). A Role for Representation in Cognitive Neurobiology. Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 77 (5):875-887.
Hengwei Li & Huaxin Huang (2007). Representation and Development of Cognition. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600.
Alexander Riegler (ed.) (1999). Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Steven French (2003). A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don't Know Much About Art...But I Know It Involves Isomorphism). Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Gabriel Vacariu, Dalia Terhesiu & Mihai Vacariu (2001). Toward a Very Idea of Representation. Synthese 129 (2):275-295.
Michael L. Anderson (2005). Representation, Evolution and Embodiment. Theoria Et Historia Scientarum.
Angela Mendelovici (2010). Mental Representation and Closely Conflated Topics. Dissertation, Princeton University
Vincent C. Müller (2007). Is There a Future for AI Without Representation? Minds and Machines 17 (1):101-115.
Peter Wallis (2004). Intention Without Representation. Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):209-223.
Benny Shanon (1991). Representations - Senses and Reasons. Philosophical Psychology 4 (3):355-74.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich (2000). Extending the Classical View of Representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12):470-475.
Added to index2012-02-14
Total downloads9 ( #246,136 of 1,725,413 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,739 of 1,725,413 )
How can I increase my downloads?