David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 52 (1):44-63 (1985)
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol. 52, number 1, pp.44-63. R.M. Nugayev, Kazan State |University, USSR. THE HISTORY OF QUANTUM THEORY AS A DECISIVE ARGUMENT FAVORING EINSTEIN OVER LJRENTZ. Abstract. Einstein’s papers on relativity, quantum theory and statistical mechanics were all part of a single research programme ; the aim was to unify mechanics and electrodynamics. It was this broader program – which eventually split into relativistic physics and quantummmechanics – that superseded Lorentz’s theory. The argument of this paper is partly historical and partly methodological. A notion of “crossbred objects” – theoretical objects with contradictory properties which are part of the domain of application of two different research programs – is developed that explains the dynamics of revolutionary theory change.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard & Steve Wykstra (1986). Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research. Synthese 69 (2):141 - 223.
Bryson Brown (1990). How to Be Realistic About Inconsistency in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (2):281-294.
Pablo Acuña (2014). On the Empirical Equivalence Between Special Relativity and Lorentz׳s Ether Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):283-302.
Rinat M. Nugayev (2015). Communicative Rationality of the Maxwellian Revolution. Foundations of Science 20 (4):447-478.
Yuri V. Balashov (1993). Book Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 38 (3):429-432.
Similar books and articles
Angelo Bassi (ed.) (2006). Quantum Mechanics: Are There Quantum Jumps? Trieste, Italy, 5 Spetember -2005 and on the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics Lošinj, Croatia 7-9 September 2005. [REVIEW] American Institute of Physics.
Arthur Fine (1996). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Robert Clifton, Constantine Pagonis & Itamar Pitowsky (1992). Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:114 - 128.
Harvey R. Brown & Christopher G. Timpson, Why Special Relativity Should Not Be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics.
Jeroen van Dongen (2007). The Interpretation of the Einstein-Rupp Experiments and Their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37:121-131.
J. Bub (2000). Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):75-94.
Rinat M. Nugayev (1996). Why Did the New Physics Force Out the Old? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #119,062 of 1,781,419 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,885 of 1,781,419 )
How can I increase my downloads?