Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1):1--43 (1993)
|Abstract||Words like you, here, and tomorrow are different from other expressions in two ways. First, and by definition, they have different kinds of meanings, which are context-dependent in ways that the meanings of names and descriptions are not. Second, their meanings play a different kind of role in the interpretations of the utterances that contain them. For example, the meaning of you can be paraphrased by a description like "the addressee of the utterance." But an utterance of (1) doesn't say the same thing as an utterance of (2)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Murali Ramachandran (1995). Bach on Behalf of Russell. Analysis 55 (4):283 - 287.
John Perry (1997). Reflexivity, Indexicality and Names. In W. Künne, A. Newen & M. Anduschus (eds.), Direct Reference, Indexicality and Propositional Attitudes. Csli.
Kevin Mulligan & Barry Smith (1986). A Husserlian Theory of Indexicality. Grazer Philosophische Studien 28:133-163.
Claudia Bianchi (2006). 'Nobody Loves Me': Quantification and Context. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):377 - 397.
Petr Kot'?Tko (1998). Two Notions of Utterance Meaning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98:225 - 239.
Erich Rast (2006). Reference and Indexicality. Dissertation, Roskilde University
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #10,323 of 722,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?