David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):99-117 (2007)
In this paper I argue that Isaiah Berlin’s theory of freedom should not be interpreted in a reductive sense. The distinction between negative and positive freedom, as different concepts and possibly conflicting values, truly holds (thereby excluding reductive interpretations that claim there is only one concept of freedom). Moreover, Berlin’s theory as a whole leaves room for both a comprehensive liberalism which advocates autonomy, critical reflection and personal judgement, as well as a liberalism of fear which defends a minimal level of decency and modesty aims at a modus vivendi. I think Berlin’s liberalism is one of hope and fear
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi (2010). Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility. Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Isaiah Berlin (1963). The Presidential Address: "From Hope and Fear Set Free". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:1 - 30.
Gail Mason (2006). Fear and Hope: Author’s Response. Hypatia 21 (2):196 - 206.
Alan Ryan (2013). Isaiah Berlin: The History of Ideas as Psychodrama. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):61-73.
Mihhail Lotman (2001). The semiotics of culture and the phenomenology of fear. Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):417-439.
Jacob T. Levy (1996). The Multiculturalism of Fear. Critical Review 10 (2):271-283.
Vincent Geoghegan (2008). Pandora's Box: Reflections on a Myth. Critical Horizons 9 (1):24-41.
Yael Tamir (1998). A Strange Alliance: Isaiah Berlin and the Liberalism of the Fringes. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):279-289.
Eric Nelson (2005). Liberty: One Concept Too Many? Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.
Alexandros Kioupkiolis (2012). Freedom After the Critique of Foundations: Marx, Liberalism, Castoriadis, and Agonistic Autonomy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lubomira Radoilska (2009). Public Health Ethics and Liberalism. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):135-145.
Janos Kis (2013). Berlin's Two Concepts of Positive Liberty. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
James Warren (2001). Lucretius, Symmetry Arguments, and Fearing Death. Phronesis 46 (4):466-491.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #432,679 of 1,098,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #284,872 of 1,098,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?