Culpability and the definition of deontological constraints
Law and Philosophy 27 (2):105 - 122 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam S. Laufer (1996). Corporate Culpability and the Limits of Law. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):311-324.
James L. Dannemiller & William Epstein (1999). Constraining the Use of Constraints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):373-374.
Matthias Steup (2000). Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology. Acta Analytica 15 (1):25-56.
Richard Brook (1997). Is Smith Obligated That(She)Not Kill the Innocent or That She(Not Kill the Innocent): Expressions and Rationales for Deontological Constraints. Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):451-461.
Helene Ingierd & Henrik Syse (2005). Responsibility and Culpability in War. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):85-99.
Jeremy Horder (1993). Criminal Culpability: The Possibility of a General Theory. Law and Philosophy 12 (2):193 - 215.
Robert Shaver (2007). Contractualism and Restrictions. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):293 - 299.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,483 of 549,068 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
