David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 16 (3):217 – 232 (2006)
In the last 50 years, multiauthored publications have become more prevalent, given the increasing number of collaborative, interdisciplinary, multicenter research studies. The determination of authorship credit and order is a difficult process, especially for graduate students, whose disadvantaged power position in research settings increases their vulnerability to exploitation. The American Psychological Association has published ethical standards for determining authorship credit, but the power difference inherent in the student-faculty relationship may complicate this ethical dilemma. The authors reviewed a number of previously recommended strategies and proposed that determining authorship credit is most effectively facilitated through professional development.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
T. Prabhakar Clement (2014). Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):345-361.
Similar books and articles
Barton Moffatt (2011). Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship. Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
Lynne E. Sullivan & James R. P. Ogloff (1998). Appropriate Supervisor--Graduate Student Relationships. Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):229 – 248.
Eugen Tarnow (1999). The Authorship List in Science: Junior Physicists' Perceptions of Who Appears and Why. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):73-88.
Jeffrey C. Sandler & Brenda L. Russell (2005). Faculty-Student Collaborations: Ethics and Satisfaction in Authorship Credit. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):65 – 80.
Mary R. Rose & Karla Fischer (1998). Do Authorship Policies Impact Students' Judgments of Perceived Wrongdoing? Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):59 – 79.
Robyn J. Geelhoed, Julia C. Phillips, Ann R. Fischer, Elaine Shpungin & Younnjung Gong (2007). Authorship Decision Making: An Empirical Investigation. Ethics and Behavior 17 (2):95 – 115.
Laura Welfare & Corrine Sackett (2010). Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Corrine R. Sackett (2010). Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Jason J. Washburn (2008). Encouraging Research Collaboration Through Ethical and Fair Authorship: A Model Policy. Ethics and Behavior 18 (1):44 – 58.
Mary Rose & Karla Fischer (1995). Policies and Perspectives on Authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #152,927 of 1,096,734 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #164,128 of 1,096,734 )
How can I increase my downloads?