Lost in moral space: On the infringing/violating distinction and its place in the theory of rights [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 23 (4):325 - 346 (2004)
The infringing/violating distinction, first drawn by Judith Jarvis Thomson, is central to much contemporary rights theory. According to Thomson, conduct that is in some sense opposed to a right infringes it, while conduct that is also wrong violates the right. This distinction finds a home what I call, borrowing Robert Nozick's parlance, a "moral space" conception of rights, for the infringing/violating distinction presupposes that, as Nozick puts it, "a line (or hyper-plane) circumscribes an area in moral space around an individual." In this paper, I argue against the moral space conception of rights, and more specifically, against incorporating the infringing/violating distinction into a theory of rights. There are other compelling ways to think about rights and it is my goal to stimulate their exploration.
|Keywords||Law Logic Philosophy of Law Law Theory/Law Philosophy Political Science Social Issues|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Benjamin Sachs (2015). Direct Moral Grounding and the Legal Model of Moral Normativity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):703-716.
J. D. Shepherd (2012). A Human Right Not to Be Punished? Punishment as Derogation of Rights. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):31-45.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Matthew S. Bedke (2010). Explaining Compensatory Duties. Legal Theory 16 (2):91-110.
Similar books and articles
Marc A. Cohen (2010). The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):563-579.
L. W. Sumner (1987). The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford University Press.
Ori J. Herstein (2012). Defending the Right To Do Wrong. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Louis G. Lombardi (1985). The Nature of Rights. Philosophy Research Archives 11:431-439.
Paul Weithman (2009). God's Velveteen Rabbit. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):243-260.
Jeremy Waldron (2005). Nozick and Locke: Filling the Space of Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
George E. Panichas (1985). The Structure of Basic Human Rights. Law and Philosophy 4 (3):343 - 375.
Seumas Miller (2000). Collective Rights and Minority Rights. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Judith Wagner Decew (1988). Moral Rights: Conflicts and Valid Claims. Philosophical Studies 54 (1):63 - 86.
John Oberdiek (2008). What's Wrong with Infringements (Insofar as Infringements Are Not Wrong): A Reply. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 27 (3):293 - 307.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #101,145 of 1,724,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,554 of 1,724,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?