David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):67 – 77 (1990)
Abstract Two conflicting visions of technology nevertheless agree that scientists and engineers bear little moral responsibility for their inventions. According to one vision, technology is largely autonomous,? that is, self?determinative operating according to its own blind laws independently of human will. According to the other, technology is fully controllable, but control rests solely with ?end?users? as technology is, in itself, value?neutral. After a brief characterization of the domain of technology, each vision of technology is criticized in turn. Despite the many penetrating insights offered by the best exemplar of the first approach? Jacques Ellul?it is shown that his approach rests on unacceptable metaphysical and epis?temological assumptions: because it seemingly explains so much, it explains nothing; and it anthropomorphizes technology. Champions of the value neutrality thesis fail to sustain their argument because they overlook the ways in which various technologies embody the values of particular persons, institutions, or classes. Undermining these two prominent visions of technology opens the way for afresh consideration of the moral responsibilities of the creators and users of technology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maja van der Velden (2009). Design for a Common World: On Ethical Agency and Cognitive Justice. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1):37-47.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Per Sundström (1998). Interpreting the Notion That Technology is Value-Neutral. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (1):41-45.
Rayvon Fouché (ed.) (2007). Technology Studies. Sage Publications.
Michael Breen, Eamonn Conway & Barry McMillan (eds.) (2003). Technology and Transcendence. Columba Press.
Tony Grajeda (2005). Disasterologies. Social Epistemology 19 (4):315 – 319.
James Garvey (2007). The Moral Use of Technology. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (61):241-260.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads13 ( #125,691 of 1,099,958 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,958 )
How can I increase my downloads?