David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):297-308 (1998)
Uebel has recently claimed that, contrary to popular opinion, none of the philosophers of the Vienna Circle of Logical Positivists were proponents of epistemological foundationalism. According to the considerations of the current discussion, however, Uebel's conclusion is erroneous, especially with respect to the work of Moritz Schlick. The chief reason Uebel offers to support his conclusion is that current attempts to portray Schlick's epistemology as foundationalist fail to overcome its ‘ultimate incoherence’. In contrast, it is argued that current interpretations, based on the unpublished as well as the published record, provide understandings of Schlick's foundationalist epistemology as not only coherent, but plausible. In closing, Uebel's own treatment of Schlick's work, which purports to show that the most feasible candidates for foundational statements are ‘meaning-theoretic’ clarifications of the content of expressions, itself fails to accurately represent Schlick's own characterizations, and pictures Schlick's epistemology as a confused mix of epistemic and semantic insights.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zhenming Zhai (1990). The Problem of Protocol Statements and Schlick's Concept of "Konstatierungen". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23.
Thomas E. Uebel (2008). On the Production, History, and Aspects of the Reception of the Vienna Circle's Manifesto. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):70-102.
Thomas Guarino (1989). Foundationalism and Contemporary Theology. Philosophy and Theology 3 (3):241-252.
M. Schlick (1925). General Theory of Knowledge. La Salle: Open Court.
Thomas Uebel (2011). Linguistics and the Vienna Circle. Metascience 20 (2):377-379.
Henk Mulder (1985). The Vienna Circle Archive and the Literary Remains of Moritz Schlick and Otto Neurath. Synthese 64 (3):375 - 387.
Paul M. Livingston (2002). Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience. Synthese 132 (3):239-272.
Michael Hymers (2005). Going Around the Vienna Circle: Wittgenstein and Verification. Philosophical Investigations 28 (3):205–234.
Thomas E. Uebel (1996). Anti-Foundationalism and the Vienna Circle's Revolution in Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads161 ( #15,803 of 1,780,627 )
Recent downloads (6 months)104 ( #10,213 of 1,780,627 )
How can I increase my downloads?