David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 10 (4):329-346 (1988)
Teilhard’s cosmological speculation is a valuable basis for an environmental ethics that perceives individual natural objects as good in themselves and the world as good in itself. Teilhard perceives man as fundamentally part of a cosmic environmental whole that is greater than mankind taken individually or collectively. His holistic views on human biological and psychological and social evolution are, I argue,compatible with a biocentric environmental ethics. I discuss some similarities and differences with the views of the deep ecology movement. I show that Teilhard’s hierarchical system is not humanistically oriented in a way that need be interpreted by Teilhardians as contrary to environmental well-being. I argue that Teilhard’s sympathies toward transportation technology, including the automobile, can be interpreted in his holistic manner. I conclude that Teilhard’s theocentric views are also a basis for supporting an environmental ethics which is both optimistic and not anthropocentric
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Simon P. James (2000). “Thing-Centered” Holism in Buddhism, Heidegger, and Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 22 (4):359-375.
Ludovico Galleni & Francesco Scalfari (2006). Teilhard de Chardin's Engagement with the Relationship Between Science and Theology in the Light of Discussions About Environmental Ethics. In Celia Deane-Drummond (ed.), Pierre Teilhard De Chardin on People and Planet. Equinox.
Robert Hood (1998). Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193.
Martin Drenthen (1999). The Paradox of Environmental Ethics: Nietzsche's View of Nature and the Wild. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):163-175.
Troy W. Hartley (1995). Environmental Justice: An Environmental Civil Rights Value Acceptable to All World Views. Environmental Ethics 17 (3):277-289.
Arthur J. Fabel (1994). Environmental Ethics and the Question of Cosmic Purpose. Environmental Ethics 16 (3):303-314.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (1983). The Justification of an Environmental Ethic. Environmental Ethics 5 (1):47-61.
Janna Thompson (1990). A Refutation of Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 12 (2):147-160.
Harry J. Cargas (1969). The Continuous Flame. St. Louis, Mo.,B. Herder.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?