David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 35 (02):264- (1985)
The belief that primitive men lived like beasts and that civilisation developed out of these brutal origins is found in numerous ancient authors, both Greek and Latin. It forms part of certain theories about the beginnings of culture current in late antiquity. These are notoriously difficult to trace to their sources, but they already existed in some form in the fifth century b.c. One idea common to these theories is that of progress, and for this reason a fragment of Xenophanes is sometimes cited as their remote prototype: ‘The gods did not reveal all things to men from the beginning; instead, by seeking, men discover what is better in time’. Mainly on the strength of this fragment, Ludwig Edelstein devoted the first chapter of his book The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity to Xenophanes, and W. K. C. Guthrie has even declared that there is good reason to attribute to him a fuller account of progress, one that would include details found in later authors who speak of the early life of mankind. One of these details is the statement that the life of primitive men was ‘brutal’ or ‘beastlike’ . In these authors the implication of that term varies from ‘unschooled in the basic crafts’ to ‘inhumanly violent and bloodthirsty’. In one sense or the other it is repeatedly encountered in ancient references to this subject. Accounts of primitive brutishness which make use of the word θηριώδης (or θηριωδς can be found in the Suppliants of Euripides, in the Hippocratic treatise On Ancient Medicine, in three passages of Diodorus, one of which is thought by some to contain Democritean doctrine, in four passages of Isocrates, in a fragment from a satyr-play Sisyphus which the ancient sources attribute variously to Euripides and to Critias, in a fragment of Athenion, in a second-century inscription, in Plutarch, in Tatian, in Themistius, and in a scholion to Euripides
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Patzia, Xenophanes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Thorp (2003). Aristotle on Brutishness. Dialogue 42 (04):673-.
W. R. Paton (1921). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Rushworth Kennard Davis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1919. 4s. 6d Net. The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Translated by Gilbert Murray. London: Allen and Unwin, 1920. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (5-6):107-108.
Jenny Bryan (2012). Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge University Press.
A. F. Garvie (1966). The Text of Aeschylus R. D. Dawe: Repertory of Conjectures on Aeschylus. Pp. 179. Leiden: Brill, 1965. Cloth, Fl. 40. The Classical Review 16 (03):284-286.
A. S. Owen (1913). Aeschylus' Septem The Seven Against Thebes of Aeschylus. Rendered Into English Verse by Edwyn Bevan. 1 Vol. 7¾″ × 5″. Pp. 96. London: Edward Arnold, 1912. Price 2s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (08):277-.
J. U. Powell (1908). Recent Criticism of Aeschylus The Eumenides of Aeschylus, with an Introduction, Commentary, and Translation, by A. W. Verrall, Litt.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. London: Macmillan & Co., St. Martin's Street, 1908. Pp. Lxi + 208. The Eumenides of Aeschylus, Translated From a Revised Text by Walter Headlam, Litt.D., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. London: George Bell & Sons, 1908. The Prometheus Bound of Aeschylus, Translated From a Revised Text. The Same Author and Publisher. 1908. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (06):182-185.
A. Y. Campbell (1944). Aeschylus Eduard Fraenkel: Aeschylus: Old Texts and New Problems. (From the Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. Xxviii.) Pp. 24. London: Milford, 1943. Paper, 2s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (01):21-22.
Arvind Sharma (1999). The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):223 - 256.
A. F. Garvie (1973). Aeschylus' Supplices H. Friis Johansen and Ole Smith: Aeschylus, The Suppliants. Vol. I. (Classica Et Mediaevalia, Dissertationes Vii.) Pp. 171. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1970. Cloth. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (01):21-22.
Stanley Ireland (2005). Aeschylus' Suppliants P. Sandin: Aeschylus' Supplices. Introduction and Commentary on Vv. 1–523 . Pp. Vi + 251. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, 2003. Paper, €25. ISBN: 91-628-5920-X. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (1):18.
A. W. Verrall (1893). Richter's Drama of Aeschylus Zur Dramaturgie des Aeschylus, von P. Richter. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. 1892. Mk. 6.50. The Classical Review 7 (03):111-115.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads4 ( #549,315 of 1,793,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?