American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482 (2002)
|Abstract||Is it the case that God, human beings, and air all share the same capacity for cognition, differing only in the degree to which they engage in cognitive acts? Robert Pasnau has recently argued that according to St. Thomas Aquinas they do, a conclusion that for Pasnau follows straightforwardly from Aquinas’s discussion of God’s cognition in the first part of the Summa theologiae. Further, Pasnau holds that Aquinas’s relation to contemporary cognitive theory should be understood in light of the discussion of God. This essay argues that Pasnau’s analysis is mistaken. It begins by explaining Pasnau’s position. It then considers the problems this reading introduces into Aquinas’s discussion of God’s cognition, as well as those it faces when addressed to air and other cognitive media. Finally, it shows the role that Aquinas’s doctrine of analogy plays in understanding how “cognition” is said of human beings, how it is said of God, and how it is not said in the case of air and other cognitive media. It concludes by suggesting that the logic of analogy is Aquinas’s most crucial contribution to contemporary discussions of mind and cognition|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Robert Pasnau (2002). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae 1a, 75-89. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Pasnau (2002). What Is Cognition? A Reply to Some Critics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):483-490.
Antonio Donato (2003). The Role of Focus in Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
John F. Wippel (2003). Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas's Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God. Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
A. Broadie (1999). Aquinas's Philosophical Theology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):353 – 358.
Robert Pasnau (1997). Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Pasnau (2000). Review of John Finnis, Aquinas: &Quot;aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory&Quot;. [REVIEW] Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):407-413.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
W. Matthews Grant (2001). Aquinas Among Libertarians and Compatibilists. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:221-235.
Craig A. Boyd (2005). Participation Metaphysics in Aquinas's Theory of Natural Law. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):431-445.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2005). The Rest of Cajetan's Analogy Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #169,995 of 722,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?