More Words on the Verbum

Abstract
In “Verbum Mentis: Theological or Philosophical Doctrine?” (Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 74, 2000), I argued against a common interpretation of Aquinas’s discussion of the verbum mentis. The common interpretation holds that the verbum mentis constitutes an essential part of Aquinas’s philosophical psychology. I argued, on the contrary, that it is no part of Aquinas’s philosophical psychology, but is a properly theological discussion grounded in the practice of scriptural metaphor, exemplified by such metaphors as “Christ is a rock.” James Doig challenges my alternate interpretation. His argument has three parts. He insists, first, that the discussion of the verbum mentis was a philosophical discussion in Aquinas’s predecessors, and that Aquinas never rejected this tradition; second, that it appears as a philosophical discussion in Aquinas’s commentary on the Gospel of John; third, that in the Summa theologiae, while there is no philosophical reason for Aquinas to discuss the verbum mentis in the context of the essence, powers, and operations of the soul (Ia, qq. 75–89), it is nevertheless a philosophical discussion in the examination of thedivine Trinity (Ia, qq. 27–43) Here I respond to and argue against all three legs of Doig’s counterargument
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,018
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
James C. Doig (2003). O'Callaghan on Verbum Mentis in Aquinas. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):233-255.
John P. O'Callaghan (2000). Verbum Mentis. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:103-119.
John Arthos (2004). “The Word is Not Reflexive”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):581-608.
John P. O'Callaghan (2002). Aquinas, Cognitive Theory, and Analogy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482.
Kevin W. Sharpe (2005). Thomas Aquinas and Nonreductive Physicalism. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:217-227.
M. V. Dougherty (2002). Thomas Aquinas and Divine Command Theory. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:153-164.
Joseph G. Trabbic (2002). Aquinas and Continental Philosophy of Religion. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:211-228.
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
Richard C. Taylor & Max Herrera (2005). Aquinas's Naturalized Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

8 ( #170,109 of 1,101,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #116,185 of 1,101,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.