David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 9 (34):195 - 208 (1934)
The generally accepted interpretation of Kant's formula “act only on that maxim which thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law,” is roughly as follows:— Our moral experience is fundamentally a consciousness of the difference between Duty and Inclination, between "doing what we ought to whether we like to or not, and doing merely what we like whether we ought to or not."1 When we have open to our choice different acts, there are some which we would like to do, others we would not like to do, and perhaps others towards which we are indifferent; or we like to do any one of them, or we may dislike all, or we may be indifferent to all. But we must ignore our inclinations, our aversions, our attractions, and our indifferences. We must ask ourselves which of the acts open to our choice ought we to do, no matter what our feelings in the matter may be
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stale R. S. Finke (2000). Habermas and Kant: Judgement and Communicative Experience. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):21-45.
Robin W. Lovin (1998). Moral Reason, Risk, and Comparative Inquiry: A Response to Francisca Cho. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):167-174.
Paul Saurette (2002). Kant's Culture of Humiliation: Politics and Ethical Cultivation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):59-90.
Jeffrey Edwards & Stony Brook (2000). Egoism and Formalism in the Development of Kant's Moral Philosophy. Kant-Studien 91 (4):411-432.
Paul Guyer (1977). Formalism and the Theory of Expression in Kant's Aesthetics. Kant-Studien 68 (1-4):46-70.
Nick Zangwill (1999). Feasible Aesthetic Formalism. Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
Carl H. Hamburg (1959). Kant's First Steps Toward an Ethical Formalism. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 8:103-110.
Jennifer A. McMahon (2010). The Classical Trinity and Kant's Aesthetic Formalism. Critical Horizons 11 (3):419-441.
Robert W. Hall (1961). Kant and Ethical Formalism. Kant-Studien 52 (1-4):433-439.
Wayne A. Mastin (1991). A Purely Formal Ethical Theory in Kant's Groundwork? Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):3-20.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads12 ( #286,939 of 1,796,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?