And This All Men Call God
Faith and Philosophy 21:417-435 (2004)
| Abstract | Philosophical discussion of theistic arguments mainly focus on their first (existence) stage, which argues for the existence of something having some very general, if suggestive, feature. I shall instead consider only the second (identification) stage of one such argument, the cosmologic al argument from contingency. Taking for granted the existence of an absolutely necessary being, I develop an extended line of argument that supports the.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesThomas Krettek (1997). The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):329-352.
Luke Gelinas (2006). The Stoic Argument Ex Gradibus Entium. Phronesis 51 (1):49-73.
Michael Almeida (2007). Martin on Miracles. Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Peter Millican (1989). The Devil's Advocate. Cogito 3 (3):193-207.
Timothy O.’Connor (2004). And This All Men Call God. Faith and Philosophy 21 (4):417-435.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
William L. Rowe (2009). Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Rooney (2009). Reconsidering the Place of Teleological Arguments for the Existence of God in the Light of the ID/Evolution Controversy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:227 - 240.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-13Total downloads142 ( #3,005 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #11,176 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
