David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):233-256 (2005)
This article is an attempt to situate imagination within consciousness complete with its own pre-cognitive, cognitive, and meta-cognitive domains. In the first sections we briefly review traditional philosophical and psychological conceptions of the imagination. The majority have viewed perception and imagination as separate faculties, performing distinct functions. A return to a phenomenological account of the imagination suggests that divisions between perception and imagination are transcended by precognitive factors of sense of reality and non-reality where perception and imagination play an indivisible role. In fact, both imagination and perception define sense of reality jointly according to what is possible and not possible. Absorption in a possible world depends on the strengths of alternative possibilities, and the relationship between core and marginal consciousness. The model may offer a parsimonious account of different states and levels of imaginal consciousness, and of how “believed-in imaginings” develop and become under some circumstances “lived-in experiences.”
|Keywords||*Cognition *Imagination *Metacognition *Perception *Precognition Reality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sigmund Freud & A. A. Brill (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (20):551-555.
Derek Edwards, Malcolm Ashmore & Jonathan Potter (1995). Death and Furniture: The Rhetoric, Politics and Theology of Bottom Line Arguments Against Relativism. History of the Human Sciences 8 (2):25-49.
S. LaBerge & D. DeGracia (2000). Varieties of Lucid Dreaming Experience. In Robert G. Kunzendorf & B. Alan Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins 269--307.
Bruce Mangan (1993). Some Philosophical and Empirical Implications of the Fringe. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (2):142-154.
Richard A. Bryant & David Mallard (2003). Seeing is Believing: The Reality of Hypnotic Hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2):219-230.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence W. Barsalou (2010). Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):716-724.
Patrick Cavanagh (1999). The Cognitive Impenetrability of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):370-371.
Nigel J. T. Thomas (2014). The Multidimensional Spectrum of Imagination: Images, Dreams, Hallucinations, and Active, Imaginative Perception. Humanities 3 (2):132-184.
Nigel J. T. Thomas (1999). Are Theories of Imagery Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content. Cognitive Science 23 (2):207-245.
A. P. Shimamura (2000). Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):313-323.
Paul Harris (2000). The Work of the Imagination. Wiley-Blackwell.
Nigel J. T. Thomas (2003). Imagining Minds. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (11):79-84.
Kieron P. O'Connor & Frederick Aardema (2005). The Imagination: Cognitive, Pre-Cognitive, and Meta-Cognitive Aspects. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):233-256.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #72,618 of 1,938,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #294,284 of 1,938,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?