Act and Maxim: Value-discrepancy and two theories of power
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):71-92 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Charles B. Cross (1997). The Modal Logic of Discrepancy. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (2):143-168.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1995). What’s So Special About Sentences? Communication and Cognition 28 (4):409-25.
Rob Gressis (2010). Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I: Established Approaches. Philosophy Compass 5 (3):216-227.
Graham Oddie & Peter Milne (1991). Act and Value: Expectation and the Representability of Moral Theories. Theoria 57 (1-2):42-76.
René van Woudenberg (2006). Conceivability and Modal Knowledge. Metaphilosophy 37 (2):210–221.
David Forman (2012). Principled and Unprincipled Maxims. Kant-Studien 103 (3):318-336.
Garrath Williams (2011). Hannah Arendt on Power. In Keith Dowding (ed.), Encyclopedia of Power. Sage.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Teleology, Consequentialism, and the Past. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Daniel Jacobson (2002). An Unsolved Problem for Slote's Agent-Based Virtue Ethics. Philosophical Studies 111 (1):53 - 67.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |

