Armstrong on the eleatic principle and abstract entities
Philosophical Studies 41 (2):285 - 295 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesScott Berman (2008). Universals: Ways or Things? Metaphysica 9 (2):219-234.
Michael Rea (2001). How to Be an Eleatic Monist. Noûs 35 (s15):129-151.
Roy Sorenson (2005). The Ethics of Empty Worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):349-356.
Raja A. Bahlul (1988). Ockham's Razor and the Identity of Indiscernables. Philosophy Research Archives 14:405-414.
G. B. Kerferd (1961). Eleatic Philosophy J. H. M. M. Loenen: Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy. Pp. 207. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1959. Paper, Fl. 14.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (01):26-27.
M. J. Cresswell (2010). Abstract Entities in the Causal Order. Theoria 76 (3):249-265.
Markku Keinänen (2008). Armstrong's Conception of Supervenience. In Tim de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.), Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84.
Holly Gail Thomas (1995). The Principle of Recombination and the Principle of Distinctness: A Puzzle for Armstrong's Theory of Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):444 – 457.
Mark Colyvan (1998). Can the Eleatic Principle Be Justified? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):313-335.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads40 ( #28,942 of 551,054 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 551,054 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
