David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 75 (1):85-111 (2011)
The distinction between the essence of an object and its properties has been obscured in contemporary discussion of essentialism. Locke held that the properties of an object are exclusively those features that ‘flow’ from its essence. Here he follows the Aristotelian theory, leaving aside Locke’s own scepticism about the knowability of essence. I defend the need to distinguish sharply between essence and properties, arguing that essence must be given by form and that properties flow from form. I give a precise definition of what the term of art ‘flow’ amounts to, and apply the distinction to various kinds of taxonomic issues
|Keywords||Philosophy Epistemology Ethics Ontology Logic Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. M. Armstrong (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Bird (1998). Dispositions and Antidotes. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):227-234.
Alexander Bird (2007). Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford University Press.
Alexander Bird (2001). Necessarily, Salt Dissolves in Water. Analysis 61 (4):267–274.
B. D. Ellis (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tuomas E. Tahko (2013). Soames's Deflationism About Modality. Erkenntnis 78 (6):1367-1379.
Travis Dumsday (2013). Laws of Nature Don't Have Ceteris Paribus Clauses, They Are Ceteris Paribus Clauses. Ratio 26 (2):134-147.
Travis Dumsday (2013). Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism. Erkenntnis 78 (4):869-880.
Travis Dumsday (2012). Dispositions, Primitive Activities, and Essentially Active Objects. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):43-64.
Similar books and articles
David S. Oderberg (2007). Real Essentialism. Routledge.
Gábor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10:27-59.
David Yates (2013). The Essence of Dispositional Essentialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):93-128.
Gabor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10 (27):27-59.
Peter King (2005). Duns Scotus on Singular Essences. Medioevo 30:111-137.
Alexander Bird (2009). Essences and Natural Kinds. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge. 497--506.
Brandon Warmke (2010). Artifact and Essence. Philosophia 38 (3):595-614.
Lee-Sun Choi (2008). Essence and Identity. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:29-36.
L. A. Paul (2006). In Defense of Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):333–372.
Nicholas Okrent (1998). Spinoza on the Essence, Mutability and Power of God. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):71-84.
Nigel Leary (2009). How Essentialists Misunderstand Locke. History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (3):273-292.
Alvin Plantinga (1979). De Essentia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 7:101-121.
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Essence and Modality. Mind 115 (459):659-693.
Added to index2011-04-14
Total downloads198 ( #3,860 of 1,410,183 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #16,266 of 1,410,183 )
How can I increase my downloads?