|Abstract||In this essay, I ﬁrst set out the principles of change, paying particular attention to the need for a support for all changes and to the need for prime matter. I then discuss the nature of time, arguing that time is not actually composed of durationless instants but that instants can be understood as limits to an inﬁnite process of potential division. I then give a deﬁnition of instants in terms of intervals and propose a way of modeling them. In the next section I bring together the two previous sections by explaining change as an instantaneous process that does not involve actual instants. In the ﬁnal section I draw out a larger metaphysical moral that emphasizes the role of potentiality and sees the potentiality in change and the potentiality in time as but different aspects of the same radical potentiality in nature.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Richard Swinburne (1993). God and Time. In Eleonore Stump (ed.), Reasoned Faith. Cornell University Press.
Yuri Balashov (2007). Defining ‚Exdurance'. Philosophical Studies 133 (1):143 - 149.
Cinzia Arruzza (2011). Passive Potentiality in the Physical Realm: Plotinus' Critique of Aristotle in Enneads II 5 . Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):24-57.
Pierre Grenon & Barry Smith (2004). SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4 (1):69–103.
Mary Louise Gill (2004). Part I: Analysis of Dynamic Categories: Aristotle's Distinction Between Change and Activity. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 14 (1-3):3-22.
Rupert Read (2002). Is ‘What is Time?’ A Good Question to Ask? Philosophy 77 (2):193-210.
Michael Dummett (2000). Is Time a Continuum of Instants? Philosophy 75 (4):497-515.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #41,878 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,273 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?