David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:203-227 (2004)
There are a number of ways in which a person can share the guilt of another's wrongdoing. He might advise it, command it or consent to it. He might provoke it, praise it, flatter the wrongdoer, or conceal the wrong. He might stay silent when there is a clear duty to denounce the wrong or its perpetrator; or he might positively defend the wrong done. Finally, he might actively participate or cooperate in the wrongdoing. These various activities, apart from cooperation, typically occur before or after the commission of the wrong itself, only provocation being essentially before the fact. As such they fall into the categories of seduction or comfort, seduction being essentially pre-commission and comfort post-commission. In seduction , the seducer typically leads another into doing wrong who has not definitely made up his mind. He does not assist in the commission, but he leads to its occurring. If the principal has made up his mind, actions which might otherwise amount to seduction are best characterized as amounting to scandal, since they do not lead to wrong but reinforce the principal in his wrongful intent or provide to third parties a bad example since they connote approval of the principal's action. Closely related to the concept of seduction is that of solicitation, though perhaps these are best thought of as two aspects of the same kind of activity. Seduction can be thought of as a strong form of inducement to wrong, typified by command, counsel and enticement through praise or provocation. Solicitation is a softer form of inducement typically involving requests, appeals, and invitations. Whereas the seducer or solicitor leads another into wrong but does not assist in its commission, the co-operator does not lead the principal into wrong but assists in its commission
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marcia P. Miceli (2004). Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process? Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):219-242.
Susan Ayers & Steven E. Kaplan (2005). Wrongdoing by Consultants: An Examination of Employees' Reporting Intentions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):121 - 137.
Alec Walen (2013). Wrongdoing Without Motives: Why Victor Tadros is Wrong About Wrongdoing and Motivation. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 32 (2-3):217-240.
Keith Horton (2008). Transnational Medical Aid and the Wrongdoing of Others. Public Health Ethics 1 (2):171-179.
John Lipinski, Adele Queiroz, Jaime C. Rubin & M. J. Paula Soruco (2005). Corporate Wrongdoing. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:263-266.
Justin A. Capes (2012). Blameworthiness Without Wrongdoing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):417-437.
Todd Calder (2013). Is Evil Just Very Wrong? Philosophical Studies 163 (1):177-196.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1996). Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
William Robert Kiser (1992). A Hospital Ethics Committee at War: The Hospital Ship Mercy Experience During Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (4):389.
Granville King (2001). Perceptions of Intentional Wrongdoing and Peer Reporting Behavior Among Registered Nurses. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):1 - 13.
Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2007). Socrates on How Wrongdoing Damages the Soul. Journal of Ethics 11 (4):337 - 356.
Dilek Zamantili Nayir & Christian Herzig (2012). Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):197-213.
David L. Mclain & John P. Keenan (1999). Risk, Information, and the Decision About Response to Wrongdoing in an Organization. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (3):255 - 271.
William D. Wood (2009). Axiology, Self-Deception, and Moral Wrongdoing in Blaise Pascal's Pensées. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):355-384.
Margaret R. Holmgren (2012). Forgiveness and Retribution: Responding to Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-12-07
Total downloads10 ( #347,073 of 1,911,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,814 of 1,911,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?