David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 21 (2):28-44 (2006)
: In Luce Irigaray's thought, Socrates is a marginal figure compared to Plato or Hegel. However, she does identify the Socratic dialectical position as that of a 'phallocrat' and she does conflate Socratic and Platonic philosophy in her psychoanalytic reading of Plato in Speculum of the Other Woman. In this essay, I critically interpret both Irigaray's own texts and the Platonic dialogues in order to argue that: (1) the Socratic dialectical position is not 'phallocratic' by Irigaray's own understanding of the term; (2) that Socratic (early Platonic) philosophy should not be conflated with the mature Platonic metaphysics Irigaray criticizes; and (3) that Socratic dialectical method is similar in some respects with the dialectical method of Diotima, Socrates' instructress in love and the subject of Irigaray's "Sorcerer Love" essay in An Ethics of Sexual Difference
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Dewey (2008/1958). Experience and Nature. McCutchen Pr.
Luce Irigaray (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Cornell University Press.
Karl R. Popper (1966). The Open Society and its Enemies. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
Luce Irigaray (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One. Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Luce Irigaray & Eleanor H. Kuykendall (1989). Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato's Symposium, Diotima's Speech. Hypatia 3 (3):32 - 44.
Gayle Salamon (2010). Sameness, Alterity, Flesh: Luce Irigaray and the Place of Sexual Undecidability. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press
Mary Beth Mader (2003). All Too Familiar: Luce Irigaray's Recent Thought on Sexuation and Generation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):367-390.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Tina Chanter (2010). Irigaray's Challenge to the Fetishistic Hegemony of the Platonic One and Many. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Elizabeth Hirsh, Gary A. Olson & Gaëton Brulotte (1995). "Je-Luce Irigaray": A Meeting with Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 10 (2):93 - 114.
Andrea Nye (1989). The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato's Symposium. Hypatia 3 (3):45 - 61.
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #119,089 of 1,725,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?