David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):649–653 (2003)
Paul Gregory's careful and insightful response to "Carnap and Two Dogmas of Empiricism" highlights a number of points which were underdeveloped in that paper. I think that he has brought into relief a central issue between Carnap and Quine by supplying a crucial distinction. However I still maintain that Quine's assault is less than successful and that Gregory's further analysis of the debate sheds light on why this is so
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald R. Gregory (1978). Would a Satanic Resurrection World Falsify Christian Theism? Reply to Gregory S. Kavka. Religious Studies 14 (1):69 - 72.
Paul O'Grady (2003). The Scope of Deflationism: Reply to Gregory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):649-653.
Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Paul Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Paul Gregory (2003). Putting the Bite Back Into. Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Paul O'Grady (1999). Carnap and Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1015-1027.
Paul O'Grady (2003). The Scope of Deflationism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):649-653.
Gregory Lavers (2012). On the Quinean-Analyticity of Mathematical Propositions. Philosophical Studies 159 (2):299-319.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #128,895 of 1,089,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,154 )
How can I increase my downloads?