Wittgenstein and relativism
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):315 – 337 (2004)
| Abstract | Wittgenstein is often associated with different forms of relativism. However, there is ambiguity and controversy about whether he defended relativistic views or not. This paper seeks to clarify this issue by disambiguating the notion of relativism and examining Wittgenstein's relevant texts in that light. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRam Neta (2007). In Defense of Epistemic Relativism. Episteme 4 (1):30-48.
Martin Kusch (2010). Kripke's Wittgenstein, on Certainty, and Epistemic Relativism. In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Aaron Z. Zimmerman (2007). Against Relativism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):313-348.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
Annalisa Coliva (2010). Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist? Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):1-23.
Shelley L. Trianosky-Stillwell (1983). 'Necessity' and 'Provability' in the Later Wittgenstein. History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2):39-61.
Paul O'Grady (2004). Wittgenstein and Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):315-337.
Paul O'Grady (2004). Wittgenstein and Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):315-337.
Duncan Richter (2001). Wittgensteinian Foundationalism. Erkenntnis 55 (3):349–358.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads41 ( #27,954 of 549,715 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,715 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
