David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):525-526 (1998)
There is not enough reason to believe that syllables are primary in speech and evolved from the cyclic movements of chewing. There are many differences between chewing and speech and it is equally plausible that what is primary in speech is a succession of auditorily robust modulations of various acoustic parameters (amplitude, periodicity, spectrum, pitch); syllables could have evolved from this.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Asif A. Ghazanfar & Donald B. Katz (1998). Distributed Neural Substrates and the Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):516-517.
Olivier le Guen (2011). Speech and Gesture in Spatial Language and Cognition Among the Yucatec Mayas. Cognitive Science 35 (5):905-938.
Peter F. MacNeilage (2003). Mouth to Hand and Back Again? Could Language Have Made Those Journeys? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):233-234.
Lorraine McCune (1998). Frame Dominance: A Developmental Phenomenon? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):522-523.
Peter F. MacNeilage (1998). The Frame/Content Theory of Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):499-511.
Hugh W. Buckingham (1998). Embodiment, Muscle Sense, and Memory for Speech. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):515-515.
Irene M. Pepperberg (1998). Out of the Mouths of Babes . . . And Beaks of Birds? A Broader Interpretation of the Frame/Content Theory for the Evolution of Speech Production. [REVIEW] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):526-527.
Trevor A. Harley (1998). Content Without a Frame? The Role of Vocabulary Biases in Speech Errors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):518-519.
James P. Lund (1998). Is Speech Just Chewing the Fat? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):522-522.
Peter F. MacNeilage (1998). The Frame/Content View of Speech: What Survives, What Emerges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):532-538.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #281,563 of 1,410,227 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,456 of 1,410,227 )
How can I increase my downloads?