Peirce, Plato and miracles: On the mature Peirce's re-discovery of Plato and the overcoming of nominalistic prejudice in history
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 26-39 (2008)
Twenty-three years ago Robert Ayers noticed several brief and intriguing comments on miracles in the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (CP). Working with just those scraps of information from the CP, he stitched together a rough but helpful starting point for understanding this aspect of Peirce's religious and scientific thought. In the last few years several more articles on this subject have been written, each filling in a gap left by the others: Ayers' is a theological view, based solely on the CP; later articles fill out Peirce's mathematics and his logic. This paper attempts to fill in a genealogical gap by showing how his thought on miracles is directly related to his dialogues with Plato, Hume, and Lutoslawski. My resources are largely unpublished manuscripts, many of which are fragmentary. I show the relationship between these manuscripts and two key published essays, "Philosophy and the Conduct of Life" (1898), and "On the Logic of Drawing History from Ancient Documents, Especially from Testimonies" (1901), and then show how Peirce, in dialogue with Plato, exposes and overcomes the nominalistic and anti-miracle prejudices of historiography in his day. The resulting view of history is fallibilistic, realistic and evolutionary, in which miracles are not violations of laws of nature but are to be expected as evolutionary variations that form part of the ongoing self-revelation of the cosmos. Miracles, like all events in history, must not be viewed prejudicially by adherents or detractors, but must be taken into careful account in the grand induction of history and science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Burch (2010). If Universes Were as Plenty as Blackberries: Peirce on Induction and Verisimilitude. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):423-452.
Arthur W. Burks (1996). Peirce's Evolutionary Pragmatic Idealism. Synthese 106 (3):323 - 372.
Jaime Nubiola (2005). Abduction or the Logic of Surprise. Semiotica 153 (1/4):117-130.
Kenneth R. Merrill (1991). Hume's "of Miracles," Peirce, and the Balancing of Likelihoods. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):85 - 113.
Paul Forster (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas R. Anderson (1987). Creativity and the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sami Paavola (2011). Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):252-256.
Stephen Mumford (2001). Miracles: Metaphysics and Modality. Religious Studies 37 (2):191-202.
Jérôme Havenel (2008). Peirce's Clarifications of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 86-133.
Robert H. Ayers (1980). C. S. Peirce on Miracles. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 16 (3):242 - 254.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #137,615 of 1,140,042 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,140,042 )
How can I increase my downloads?