Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):79-80 (1997)
|Abstract||Learning is the acquisition of knowledge, not of input/output mappings. The distinction between statistical and relational learning, as Clark & Thornton define those terms, is not useful because all human learning is relational. However, prior knowledge does influence later learning and the sequence in which learning tasks are encountered is indeed crucial. Simulations of sequence effects would be interesting.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Knud Illeris (ed.) (2009). Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists -- In Their Own Words. Routledge.
Luis Jimenez (2003). Intention, Attention, and Consciousness in Probabilistic Sequence Learning. In Luis Jimenez (ed.), Attention and Implicit Learning. John Benjamins.
Michael Luntley (2008). Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):1-14.
Effie Maclellan (2005). Conceptual Learning: The Priority for Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):129 - 147.
Kenneth Reisman (2007). Is Culture Inherited Through Social Learning? Biological Theory 2 (3):300-306.
Axel Cleeremans (1993). Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: Connectionist Models of Sequence Processing. MIT Press.
Sunbin Song, Howard Jr, James H. & Darlene V. Howard (2007). Implicit Probabilistic Sequence Learning is Independent of Explicit Awareness. Learning and Memory 14 (1-6):167-176.
A. Vinter & P. Perruchet (1997). Relational Problems Are Not Fully Solved by a Temporal Sequence of Statistical Learning Episodes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):82-82.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?