Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 52 (1):39-61 (2000)
|Abstract||Holistic claims about evidence are a commonplace inthe philosophy of science; holistic claims aboutmeaning are a commonplace in the philosophy oflanguage. W. V. Quine has advocated both types ofholism, and argued for an intimate link between thetwo. Semantic holism may be inferred from theconjunction of confirmation holism andverificationism, he maintains. But in their recentbook Holism: a Shopper's Guide, Jerry Fodor andErnest Lepore (1992) claim that this inference isfallacious. In what follows, I defend Quine's argumentfor semantic holism from Fodor and Lepore'smulti-pronged attack.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Pessin (1995). In Defense of Conceptual Holism: Reply to Fodor and Lepore. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:269-280.
Georges Rey (1993). The Unavailability of What We Mean: A Reply to Quine, Fodor and Lepore. In Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
M. McDermott (2001). Quine's Holism and Functionalist Holism. Mind 110 (440):977-1025.
H. G. Callaway (1992). Meaning Holism and Semantic Realism (Reprinted in Callaway 2008, Meaning Without Analyticity). Dialectica 46 (1):41-59.
M. Harrell (1996). Confirmation Holism and Semantic Holism. Synthese 109 (1):63-101.
Jerry A. Fodor & Ernest LePore (1993). Precis of Holism: A Shopper's Guide. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):637-682.
Jonathan Berg (ed.) (1993). Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Christopher Gauker (1993). Holism Without Meaning: A Critical Review of Fodor and Lepore's Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):441-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,328 of 740,432 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,338 of 740,432 )
How can I increase my downloads?