Social relationship of a firm and the csp–cfp relationship in japan: Using artificial neural networks [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):117 - 132 (2009)
As a criterion of a good firm, a lucrative and growing business has been said to be important. Recently, however, high profitability and high growth potential are insufficient for the criteria, because social influences exerted by recent firms have been extremely significant. In this paper, high social relationship is added to the list of the criteria. Empirical corporate social performance versus corporate financial performance (CSP–CFP) relationship studies that consider social relationship are very limited in Japan, and there are no definite conclusions for the studies in the world, because of scant data and the inappropriate methods, especially for supporting linear hypothesis which these studies are based on. In this paper, the CSP–CFP relationship is analyzed by an artificial neural networks model, which can deal with a non-linear relationship, using 10-year follow-up survey data.
|Keywords||artificial neural networks corporate social performance versus corporate financial performance relationship corporate social responsibility growth potential Japan linearity profitability social relationship|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Archie B. Carroll (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):503-530.
Kenneth L. Kraft & Jerald Hage (1990). Strategy, Social Responsibility and Implementation. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1):11 - 19.
Robert J. Williams & J. Douglas Barrett (2000). Corporate Philanthropy, Criminal Activity, and Firm Reputation: Is There a Link? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):341 - 350.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Heather R. Dixon-Fowler, Daniel J. Slater, Jonathan L. Johnson, Alan E. Ellstrand & Andrea M. Romi (2013). Beyond “Does It Pay to Be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):353-366.
Rim Makni, Claude Francoeur & François Bellavance (2009). Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence From Canadian Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):409 - 422.
Bernadette M. Ruf, Krishnamurty Muralidhar, Robert M. Brown, Jay J. Janney & Karen Paul (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2):143 - 156.
Marc Orlitzky (2011). Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (3):409-444.
Cyril Bouquet & Yuval Deutsch (2008). The Impact of Corporate Social Performance on a Firm's Multinationality. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):755 - 769.
Isaiah Yeshayahu Marom (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):191 - 200.
Francesco Perrini, Angeloantonio Russo, Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro (2011). Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):59-76.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
Maria-Gaia Soana (2011). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):133-148.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #149,815 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?