Graduate studies at Western
Argumentation 26 (1):19-32 (2012)
|Abstract||This essay offers a start on sorting out the relationships of argumentation and persuasion by identifying two systematic ways in which definitions of argumentation differ, namely, their descriptions of the ends and of the means involved in argumentative discourse. Against that backdrop, the traditional “conviction-persuasion” distinction is reassessed. The essay argues that the traditional distinction correctly recognizes the difference between the end of influencing attitudes and that of influencing behavior—but that it misanalyzes the means of achieving the latter (by focusing on emotional arousal) and that it mistakenly contrasts “rational” and “emotional” means of influence. The larger conclusion is that understanding the relationships of the phenomena of argumentation and persuasion will require close attention to characterizations of communicative ends and means|
|Keywords||Conviction Persuasion Argumentation Rational influence|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Anthony Blair (2012). Argumentation as Rational Persuasion. Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Marianne Doury (2012). Preaching to the Converted. Why Argue When Everyone Agrees? Argumentation 26 (1):99-114.
Ana Nettel & Georges Roque (2012). Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation. Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Christian Plantin (2012). Persuasion or Alignment? Argumentation 26 (1):83-97.
Christof Rapp & Tim Wagner (2013). On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 27 (1):7-30.
Katarzyna Budzyńska (2006). Persuasion. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):343-362.
Douglas N. Walton (2007). Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press.
Raphaël Micheli (2012). Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation. Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Beth Innocenti Manolescu (2004). Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm. Argumentation 18 (1):113-125.
Sherry Baker & David L. Martinson (2001). The Tares Test: Five Principles for Ethical Persuasion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (2 & 3):148 – 175.
Michael Davis (1999). Rhetoric, Technical Writing, and Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.
Douglas Walton & David M. Godden (2005). Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
O. Schulte (1999). Means-Ends Epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):1-31.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). On Glazer and Rubinstein on Persuasion. In Krzysztof R. Apt & Robert van Rooij (eds.), New Perspectives on Games and Interactions. Amsterdam University Press.
Michael Byron (1998). Satisficing and Optimality. Ethics 109 (1):67-93.
Added to index2011-09-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 723,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?