David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 19 (1):48-72 (2004)
: Much feminist philosophy of science has been developed as a reaction against logical empiricism and the associated view that social factors play no role in good science. Recent accounts of the Vienna Circle that highlighted the ways in which some of its members attempted to combine their empiricism with emancipatory politics are used here as a basis on which to reassess the relationship between logical empiricism and feminism. The focus is chiefly on Otto Neurath.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Helen E. Longino (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Willard V. O. Quine (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
René Descartes, Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane & G. R. T. Ross (1931). The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Rudolf Carnap (1928). Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Meiner Verlag.
Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) (1996). Origins of Logical Empiricism. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Dan Hicks (2014). A New Direction for Science and Values. Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
Thomas Uebel (2010). What's Right About Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis: A Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.
Sarah S. Richardson (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 2. The Left Vienna Circle, Disciplinary History, and Feminist Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):167-174.
Y. A. P. Audrey (2010). Feminism and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. Hypatia 25 (2):437-454.
Kourken Michaelian (2008). Privileged Standpoints/ Reliable Processes. Hypatia 23 (1):65-98.
Similar books and articles
Greg Frost-Arnold (2008). Review of Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
J. O'Neill (2003). Unified Science as Political Philosophy: Positivism, Pluralism and Liberalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):575-596.
Thomas E. Uebel (2000). Logical Empiricism and the Sociology of Knowledge: The Case of Neurath and Frank. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):150.
Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, Otto Neurath & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.) (1996). Logical Empiricism at its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. Garland Pub..
Sahotra Sarkar (ed.) (1996). The Emergence of Logical Empiricism: From 1900 to the Vienna Circle. Garland Publishing.
Otto Neurath (1946). The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4):496-508.
George A. Reisch (2001). Against a Third Dogma of Logical Empiricism: Otto Neurath and "Unpredictability in Principle". International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):199 – 209.
Thomas E. Uebel & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads114 ( #38,601 of 1,932,568 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #102,951 of 1,932,568 )
How can I increase my downloads?