Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):229-244 (2006)
|Abstract||The article asks how phenomenology, understood as a philosophical method of investigation, can account for gender. Despite the fact that it has provided useful tools for feminist inquiry, the question remains how gender can be studied within the paradigm of a philosophy of a subject. The article explicates four different understandings of phenomenology and assesses their respective potential in terms of theorizing gender: a classical reading, a corporeal reading, an intersubjective reading and a post-phenomenological reading. It concludes by arguing that phenomenology can extend its analysis to the question of gender only if its method is radically revised.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robin May Schott (1996). Gender and "Postmodern War". Hypatia 11 (4):19 - 29.
Dianne Chisholm (2008). Climbing Like a Girl: An Exemplary Adventure in Feminist Phenomenology. Hypatia 23 (1):9-40.
Julie A. Nelson (1992). Thinking About Gender. Hypatia 7 (3):138 - 154.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Marìa Lugones (2010). Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia 25 (4):742-759.
Claire Colebrook (2004). Gender. Palgrave Macmillan.
Penelope Deutscher (1997). Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy. Routledge.
J. Wallach Scott (2010). Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis? Diogenes 57 (1):7-14.
Linda Fisher & Lester E. Embree (eds.) (2000). Feminist Phenomenology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, C.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #61,410 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?