Foucault's politicization of ontology
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):445-466 (2010)
| Abstract | The paper explicates a politicized conception of reality with the help of Michel Foucault’s critical project. I contend that Foucault’s genealogies of power problematize the relationship between ontology and politics. His idea of productive power incorporates a radical, ontological claim about the nature of reality: Reality as we know it is the result of social practices and struggles over truth and objectivity. Rather than translating the true ontology into the right politics, he reverses the argument. The radicality of his method lies in showing how the ontological order of things is in itself the outcome of a political struggle: Ontology is politics that has forgotten itself. I argue that Foucault’s thought accomplishes the politicization of ontology with two key theoretical moves. The first is the contestation and provocation of all given and necessary ontological foundations. He affirms the ontological view that there is a discontinuity between reality and all ontological schemas that order it, and a subsequent indeterminacy of reason in establishing ultimate truths or foundations. After this initial step whereby ontology is denaturalized—made arbitrary or at least historically contingent—the way is open for explanations that treat the alternative and competing ontological frameworks as resulting from historical, linguistic and social practices of power. The second key move is thus the exposure of power relations and their constitutive role in our conception of reality. I conclude by considering the implications of Foucault’s politicization of ontology for our understanding of politics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Johanna Oksala (2012). Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Northwestern University Press.
Jonas R. B. Arenhart (2012). Ontological Frameworks for Scientific Theories. Foundations of Science 17 (4):339-356.
Joseph Agassi (2005). Back to the Drawing Board. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):509-518.
Hans-Johann Glock (2002). Does Ontology Exist? Philosophy 77 (2):235-260.
Nikolay Milkov (2011). Towards a Reistic Social-Historical Philosophy. In Petrov V. (ed.), Ontological Landscapes: Recent Thought on Conceptual Interfaces between Science and Philosophy. Ontos.
A. Kioupkiolis (2011). Keeping It Open: Ontology, Ethics, Knowledge and Radical Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (6):691-708.
Thomas Hofweber (1999). Ontology and Objectivity. Dissertation, Stanford University
Amy Allen (2003). Foucault and Enlightenment: A Critical Reappraisal. Constellations 10 (2):180-198.
Dianna Taylor (2003). Practicing Politics with Foucault and Kant: Toward a Critical Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):259-280.
Michael Dillon & Andrew W. Neal (eds.) (2008). Foucault on Politics, Security and War. Palgrave Macmillan.
Benda Hofmeyr (2006). The Power Not to Be (What We Are): The Politics and Ethics of Self-Creation in Foucault. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):215-230.
Stephen Pratten (2007). The Scope of Ontological Theorising. Foundations of Science 12 (3).
Ian Burkitt (1993). Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-17Total downloads34 ( #35,980 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,122 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |

