David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theory and Decision 49 (4):339-360 (2000)
The paper describes a methodology to be used for analysis and design of human activity systems. The methodology is based on an analysis of the decision settings whereas most other decision analysis methodologies are analysing the process. The decision concept is analysed and discussed. A distinction between programmed and programmable as well as non-programmed and non-programmable decisions is proposed. A classification of different information types for decision making is presented. A methodology based on a systemic and systematic analysis of the information requirements of an organization is proposed. This methodology also indicates organizational discrepancies and information imbalances. The methodology focuses the settings of the decisions on all levels of organizations. The methodology can be regarded as a dynamic, learning system. The author proposes further research on the individuals decision making abilities
|Keywords||Human activity systems Decision analysis Decision settings Organizational discrepancies Methodology Systems design Information requirement Non-programmable decisions|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kieran Mathieson (2007). Towards a Design Science of Ethical Decision Support. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):269 - 292.
Elke U. Weber, Daniel Ames & Ann-Renee Blais, 'How Do I Choose Thee? Let Me Count the Ways': A Textual Analysis of Similarities and Differences in Modes of Decision-Making in China and the United States.
Stephen G. Pauker (1984). Decision Analysis as a Basis for Medical Decision Making: The Tree of Hippocrates. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (2):181-214.
Omar E. M. Khalil (1993). Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Patrick Humphreys & Garrick Jones (2006). The Evolution of Group Decision Support Systems to Enable Collaborative Authoring of Outcomes. World Futures 62 (3):193 – 222.
Ray W. Cooksey (1996). The Methodology of Social Judgement Theory. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):141 – 174.
Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago (2001). Cultural and Ethical Effects on Managerial Decisions: Examined in a Throughput Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):355 - 367.
Greg Bamford (2002). From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/Analysis: A Review of Karl Popper’s Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture. [REVIEW] Design Studies 23 (3):245 - 61.
Patricia H. Werhane (2002). Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):33 - 42.
Christine P. Ries (2001). Enterprise Risk Management: Applications of Economic Modeling and Information Technology. Mind and Society 2 (2):1-8.
Noël Pauwels, Bartel van De Walle, Frank Hardeman & Karel Soudan (2000). The Implications of Irreversibility in Emergency Response Decisions. Theory and Decision 49 (1):25-51.
Josep M. Rosanas (2008). Beyond Economic Criteria: A Humanistic Approach to Organizational Survival. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):447 - 462.
Berndt Brehmer (1996). Man as a Stabiliser of Systems: From Static Snapshots of Judgement Processes to Dynamic Decision Making. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):225 – 238.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads4 ( #383,052 of 1,699,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?