The Dialectic of Action: A Philosophical Interpretation of History and the Humanities
Graduate studies at Western
University of Chicago Press (1979)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||History Philosophy Humanities|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$1.20 used (95% off) $100.88 new Amazon page|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Louis-Courvoisier (2005). How to Make the Most of History and Literature in the Teaching of Medical Humanities: The Experience of the University of Geneva. Medical Humanities 31 (1):51-54.
Tom Cohen (ed.) (2001). Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader. Cambridge University Press.
Armin Nassehi (1989). Action and Structure. On a Theory of Science for the Humanities. Philosophy and History 22 (2):163-164.
Daniel M. Fox (1985). Who We Are: The Political Origins of the Medical Humanities. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (3).
Mahali Phamotse & Mike Kissack (2008). The Role of the Humanities in the Modern University: Some Historical and Philosophical Considerations. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):49-65.
Jens Høyrup (1995). As Regards the Humanities--: An Approach to Their Theory Through History and Philosophy. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.
R. F. Atkinson (1982). Book Review:The Dialetic of Action: A Philosophical Theory of History and the Humanities. Frederick A. Olafson. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (2):354-.
Peter Pericles Trifonas & Michael Peters (eds.) (2005). Deconstructing Derrida: Tasks for the New Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?